The 2024 AES New York Student Recording Competition

Category 3: Modern Studio Recording & Electronic Music welcomes a broad spectrum of multitrack studio projects, specifically those not fitting into the confines of Category 2. This category is characterized by its openness to all forms of sound sources, recording techniques, and creative production approaches, including editing, processing, and mixing.

• Utilization of the recording studio as a creative instrument.
• Freedom to mix real and virtual sound sources.
• Projects can be recorded in any studio environment onto multitrack tape or a Digital Audio Workstation (DAW), fully programmed on a computer, or a blend of these methods.
• All contemporary recording techniques, signal processing, and editing strategies are permissible.
• Programming, sequencing, sampling, use of sample loops, and sample replacement/enhancement are all encouraged.
• Entire recording, production, and mixing must be executed by the participants.
• Submissions must not exceed a 5-minute runtime.
• Submissions must not be mastered.
• Dolby Atmos submissions are optional. While not part of the main evaluation, feedback will be provided for educational purposes.

Participants are free to explore music from any genre, such as pop, rock, dance, rap, hip-hop, electronica, live DJ performances, and remixes. The guiding principle here is flexibility, with the only constraint being adherence to copyright laws. This sub-category encourages the innovative use of samples, MIDI, electronic instruments, and other creative methods. However, the primary focus of the AES Student Recording Competition is to evaluate the excellence in audio recording and production, with compositional elements being considered secondary.

Category 4: Sound for Visual Media focuses on audio recordings crafted to enhance visual storytelling across various platforms. Whether it’s for narrative or documentary films, commercials, video games, or any digital visual content, this category celebrates the synergy between sound and picture.

What to Submit:
• Your work should enrich the visual experience, incorporating elements like dialogue, sound effects, and musical scores. These can come from direct production sound, libraries, synthesized sounds, or original recordings by the participant.
• Students should submit a .mov or quicktime video file with 48kHz, 24 bit audio.
• The audio must be deliberately designed to accompany the video content, ensuring a cohesive viewing experience.
• Submissions should not include music videos, live concerts, or studio session videos where music is the sole focus. Instead, each entry must feature significant non-musical sound elements — think dialogue, sound effects, character voices, object sounds, or environmental ambience.
• Video game projects can present raw gameplay audio laid over captured video, or showcase adaptive audio implemented through audio engines/middleware, combined with video.
• While creativity in sound production is encouraged, the competition primarily evaluates excellence in audio recording and production. The compositional aspects of your submission are considered secondary.

Submission Requirements:
• Craftsmanship in recording, editing, and mixing sounds to complement visual media is paramount.
• A blend of dialogue, music, foley, ambience and sound design is encouraged.
• All editing and mixing must be done by the entrant(s). • Entries are limited to a 5-minute runtime.
• Submissions may be stereo or Dolby Atmos.
• If you are selected as a finalist, you will be required to provide a channel-based mix for use at the convention, with up to 9.1.6 channels (to be confirmed once finalists are selected).
• Submission must not be mastered.

Announcement Date: Finalists will be announced 1-2 weeks prior to the start of the AES Convention. It’s important to note that the judging panel holds the discretion to determine the number of finalists, which will be based on the overall number of entries received.

Submission Guidelines:
• Each student is allowed one recording per category, with a limit of two submissions in total.
• The Director of the Recording Competition and other selected professionals will categorize submissions into their respective categories. While participants may indicate their preferred category, the final decision based on recording and musical style, will be determined by the Education Committee. This decision is final.
• Submissions will be organized by AES member number and forwarded to the appointed judges for evaluation across all categories, including Traditional Acoustic Recording, Traditional Studio Recording, Modern Studio Recording & Electronic Music, and Sound for Visual Media, among others. The criteria used for these decisions are detailed within the category descriptions and available on the AES website.

Competition Program and Presentation: During the AES Convention, the Student Recording Competition will feature a program that includes:
• Playback of Submissions: Each entry will be showcased to the attendees and judging panel.
• Student Presentations: Participants will have the opportunity to present their work in a session lasting up to 5 minutes, explaining their recording process and artistic decisions.
• Feedback Session: Following the presentation, there will be a 5-7 minute feedback period with the judges, offering constructive critiques and insights.

This format is designed to provide participants with a platform to highlight their work, engage in meaningful dialogue with professionals, and gain valuable feedback on their recording techniques and creative choices.

Authorship of your submission, just as in the case of academic articles, is of the utmost importance. While it is presumed that you may have worked with numerous individuals (producers, musicians, etc.), this work should be considered your own to claim and present (what would be considered the primary author of a paper). In many disciplines, including our own, collaboration is the norm and issues of authorship can be controversial. However, please understand that all engineers credited must have been involved throughout a majority of the production process.

If you worked with several individuals who deserve to share in the credit of the project, you may include their names as collaborators. However, note that only one individual may submit the project (as there is only one primary engineer / author of the work). As well, please understand that all individuals listed as collaborators must meet all competition eligibility guidelines.

It is not required that all student collaborators be part of the same/single audio program, however, all collaborating engineers music be AES student members, and it is the responsibility of the submitter to communicate information about the finalists to their team-members.

To allow for multiple certificates to be made for all student collaborators, please be sure to include all student collaborator information in the submission form. While the Competition may be able to duplicate prizes for co-presenters, it is not always possible and winning students should anticipate only one set of prizes.

Each contestant is required to submit detailed documentation alongside their audio mixes to provide insight into their recording and mixing process. This documentation is crucial for understanding the methodology and technical approach taken during the project’s creation.

Documentation Guidelines:
• Language: All documentation must be submitted in English.
• Length and Content: Specific methodologies, techniques and signal chains can be shared via various methods of documentation. Documentation should be between 4 to 6 pages and 800 to 1200 words, inclusive of all session documentation, photographs, screenshots and illustrations. Any content beyond this limit will not be reviewed by the judges.
• Templates: Students should feel free to use standard session documentation templates recommended by the AES Technical Committee and the Recording Academy’s Producers and Engineers Wing. These templates ensure consistency and comprehensiveness in presenting your project. More information can be found at the link below.
• AES: Recommendations for Delivery of Recorded Music Projects

• Visuals: You may include up to 8 photographs, screenshots or illustrations to support your documentation.
• Format: Documentation must be in PDF format, submitted in a zipped folder along with the audio files, adhering to the competition’s submission guidelines.
• Category Suggestion: If submitting under Category 1-3, please include a suggested category on the first page.

Anonymity Requirements:
• Your documentation should be entirely anonymized, using only your AES member number for identification.
• Refer to individuals involved in the project (e.g., performers, composers, technicians) by their first names and the initials of their surnames.
• Do not disclose recording, mixing, or mastering locations, or any details that could hint at your institution/university affiliation. This is to ensure the competition’s fairness and impartiality.

Failure to adhere to these documentation and anonymity guidelines may lead to disqualification from the competition.

Judging Overview: Entries will be anonymously reviewed by judges about a month before the convention, offering them ample time for a thorough evaluation in their preferred listening environments. The ambition and difficulty of projects will be considered, with particularly challenging entries potentially earning extra points. It’s worth keeping this in mind when selecting your project for submission.

Evaluation Criteria:

• Categories 1-3: Recording
• Quality of recorded tracks and mix
• Tonal balance, tempo, timing, and musical dynamics
• Dynamic range, track levels, and balances
• Panning, creative processing, soundstage, and spatial qualities
• Category 4: Sound for Picture
• Quality and creativity of soundtrack components
• Appropriate foley, sound design, ambiences
• Quality of dialogue recordings and editing
• Effectiveness in supporting and enhancing the visual narrative and emotional impact

Finalist Presentations: During the convention, finalists will have the opportunity to showcase their recordings. We encourage you to prepare slides or graphics illustrating your recording setup and production process. This is your chance to share any previously anonymized information with attendees.

Interactive Feedback: Judges may provide comments and ask questions before finalizing their decisions. Details on the locations and times for these Recording Presentations will be available in the convention’s Technical Program.

Communication: Please note, all judge feedback, critiques, and finalist presentations must be conducted in English. This ensures clarity and inclusiveness in the evaluation and feedback process.

In our Student Recording event, recognition is based on merit rather than competition. Instead of traditional rankings, finalists can earn Gold, Silver, Bronze, or Honorable Mention certificates based on the quality of their work. Judges may award multiple certificates in each category, reflecting the possibility of numerous exceptional projects. Awards are flexible, with any mix of Gold, Silver, Bronze, or Honorable Mentions possible. Additionally, it’s conceivable that some categories may not have entries reaching these levels of recognition. Judges are not required to select finalists for every category, emphasizing our focus on celebrating excellence and fostering a supportive, collegial atmosphere among student participants.

Our awards recognize recordings that stand out not just among student projects but hold their own in the professional realm. Here’s what we’re listening for:

• Gold: This top honor goes to recordings that hit an extraordinary mark both artistically and technically. If your submission could not only compete but potentially win awards in the commercial market, you could be looking at a Gold.

• Silver: Silver awards highlight recordings that achieve excellence on both the artistic and technical fronts. These submissions are strong contenders in the commercial marketplace, showcasing the high caliber of your work.

• Bronze: Bronze recognizes very good recordings that meet professional standards and demonstrate potential for success in the commercial arena.

• Honorable Mention: This accolade is given to submissions that are good by professional benchmarks, underscoring the talent and promise of the engineer behind the work.

Prizes as a Token of Appreciation: Awards from the AES serve primarily as a prestigious acknowledgment of exceptional student work. Prizes, while a bonus, are a way of extending our congratulations. These may include audio equipment, software, and various other items, reflecting the support and intent of our generous sponsors.

Distribution Details:

• Authority: The Director of the Recording Compeition has the final say in prize distribution.
• Considerations: Decisions are based on:
• The quantity and value of prizes
• Sponsor intentions
• The number and recognition level of awardees
• The finalist count
•
• Recipient Note: Prizes complement, not replace, your honorary certificates, symbolizing significant achievement.

Sponsorship and Prize Handling:

• Commitments: Prize availability hinges on manufacturer generosity.
• Participant Responsibility: Winners at the convention may need to manage the logistics of prize receipt, which for international students could mean arranging shipment to avoid taxes or customs issues. On-site shipping services are available to assist.
•
Remember, the true reward is the recognition of your outstanding accomplishments by the AES. Prizes are just the cherry on top!

Please note these are made with the OLD category numbering system, but are still accurate and exemplary to what is expected in terms of content.

Category 1 Documentation Examples:

Click here to view the 1st example

Click here to view the 2nd example

Category 2 or 3 Documentation Examples:
Click here to view the 1st example

Click here to view the 2nd example